NATO forces on one side & China- India on the other!! Which side will won in a nuke-banned war?

I am preparing a report on China-India rise in the world politics.


More answer I will get, more perfect would be my survey associated with it.


Please answer.

NATO forces on one side %26amp; China- India on the other!! Which side will won in a nuke-banned war?
NATO of course... NATO has better military weapons and an awesome military might.. remember Germany in WW2? if you love Germany you should check out the USA
Reply:Wihtout the use oif Nucealr Weapons.





Im sure Nato woiuld win. China has militray might. And India has the numbers but there militray aint the most resouceful.





Nato has better weaponry and more exp soldiers. It wouldn't take that long to crush India, esp if they threw an economic emagro on them.


China on the other hand would take years.





But if Nato fought against them, you can assume Pakistan would aid Nato as it hates India. And other nations would go and fight agaisnt China ( Ex. Taiwan even know they are very small, they would fight if they got independence out of it)
Reply:NATO for one big reason and two tactical reasons. The reason an Sino-Indo alliance would fail is Oil. Neither has a true blue water navy to protect their supply line to oil. If they try an overland move through Pakistan they'll find their armies ground to a fine powder on the Hindu-Kush....
Reply:NATO simply because of force projection. Nato can send powerful fleets and even make some landing capturing coastal cities, whereas India and China cannot move their troops long distances by water nor have the logistics to supply massive land armies.





and if you want to be a little dirty then blowing a few dams along the yellow river will cause floods that will drown tens of millions and a failed crop that will doom tens of millions more to starvation
Reply:If a bomb were to land on the three gorge dam in china, the country would be done for. They could not feed their army during a conventional war with America